Friday, January 31, 2020

My Vampire Boyfriend is Sucking the Life Out of Me


The section of Anne Rice's book, Interview With a Vampire, that struck me quite a bit was Luis’ final interaction with Babette. In this moment, Babette seemed to embody Luis’ frustration with own existence as a demonic being. Although he tried his best to help Babette and right Lestat’s wrongs against her family, she still sees him as a negative, other- worldly force. In this moment it seemed that Luis was never going to be anything more than the wildly vengeful killer Lestat embodied. While this interaction did not completely deter Luis from trying to be greater than Lestat, I really enjoyed the line “And then on this vast desolate landscape of night where I was standing alone and where Babette was only an illusion, I saw suddenly a possibility that I’d never considered before, a possibility from which I’d fled, rapt as I was with the world, fallen into the senses of the vampire, in love with the color and shape and sound and singing and softness and infinite variation,” in which Luis considers his efforts are worthless.
                I also found it interesting how many sections of the story end with fire. While fire is clearly a threat against vampires, specifically, it being one of the only things that can kill them, Rice also seems to use it a transitional device. When Luis’ slaves rise against him, he is forced from his home as it goes up in flames. When trying to find shelter with Babette, she throws a lantern at him, again causing him to flee. Claudia and Luis leave Lestat in a burning building when the escape to Europe and Luis also burns the theater in France, killing the vampires inside. It appears that almost every major life transition Luis faces is signified with fire, an imminent threat at first, forcing Luis to move forward and then becoming a tool Luis uses, perhaps signaling that Luis is finally free to make his own path in his life.
                Relationships are a major part of this story, the relationship between Luis and Lestat being the most prominent. I found it interesting that Luis repeatedly described his relationship with Lestat as if he were Lestat’s slave. While Lestat takes advantage of Luis is almost every way, financially, emotionally, and morally, Luis makes very few attempts to leave him, especially towards the beginning of their relationship. While I understood the implications of the almost romantic balance Luis and Lestat had before and during their raising of Claudia, the class discussion made this clearer to me. The toxic cycle of Luis wanting to leave and Lestat forcing him to stay out of guilt reflects many bad relationships in the real world. This is especially evident when contrasted with Luis and Armand’s relationship later in the book.

Note: A part that I really enjoyed was when Lestat first turned Luis and they had to sleep in the same coffin on the first night. It read as ridiculous fanfiction to me. Not to be offensive to Anne Rice as this was one of my favorite books I’ve read recently, but I guess that part aged in a very silly way. “Oh no! There’s only one bed!”

Uh Oh, My Science Project Has Achieved Sentience


I really enjoyed the framing of Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein. Not only did it parallel the actual story, but it made the story appear as if it had actually happened. It was stated in class that it was very “found footage”-esq and I completely agree.
                The book is very morally gray with it’s Gothic monster, Frankenstein’s monster. His first appearance is quite off putting, I think more so than the classic green appearance he has in media now. However, later on he is able to learn English and how to read and write. I was not expecting this, as I have always known Frankenstein’s monster as more… zombie- like. This makes it a lot harder to antagonize him in the way Victor does. However, I was then surprised when the monster confessed to murdering Victor’s younger brother. This bordered on irredeemable for me, despite the connection the reader is supposed to have made with the monster following his interaction with the DeLacey family. I don’t see the monster as totally evil, nor do I see Victor that way. This murder just caught me off guard, especially after Victor seemed to sense that the monster had done it without any evidence. I expected a twist. That maybe Justine, the maid, had killed the boy and Victor was going to have to face that the monster was more than an evil embodiment Victor believed him to be. But, no, the monster really did kill the boy.
                I found loneliness to be a pervasive aspect of this story. R.Walton, the framing device character who is writing the letters to his sister, says “I have no one near me, gentle yet courageous, possessed of a cultivated as well as of a capacious mind, whose tastes are like my own, to approve or amend my plans. How would such a friend repair the faults of your poor brother!” Walton wants someone to share his passion for exploration and knowledge. Later, Victor expresses how he would coop himself up, alone to study alchemy, rejecting friends or companions in pursuit of knowledge. He also laments that the professors at his school do not all share in his fascination with his studies. Frankenstein’s monster also expresses his loneliness in the world when he asks for Victor to make him a mate. I found it interesting that these characters all seem to feel isolated in their lives. The parallels between Walton and Victor are very strong, with both of them giving up companionship in pursuit of their passions. However, the monster is the only one who wants a companion and is denied it, resulting in more of Victor’s family being killed. Overall, I think isolation is emphasized to be something dangerous and reviled in Shelly’s story.